I think that would be great. We expect there to be bug fixes in many different
areas. https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/568 is an example. Labeling 0.10.0
as beta seems fine, so long as we have a plan in the relatively near term to
move from beta to stable.
- Bobby
On Monday, June 8, 2015 7:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote:
Looks like it's 0.10.x-specific.
Perhaps we should label 0.10.0 as a beta?
At least that way the user community could at least kick the tires on the new
features, and know that known bugs are being addressed. And honestly, we
probably should have switched to that model earlier.
I think it would be good to get this version in the hands of users, even if it
is only early adopters and beta testers (an important part of the community
that should always be considered for committer/PMC membership, even if they
don't make changes to the core code).
-Taylor
> On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Derek Dagit <der...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Found STORM-856: If nimbus goes down with a delayed kill topo cmd, it never
> comes up
>
>
> Not sure if this is particular to the 0.10.0 line, but it seems bad.
>
> --
> Derek
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@storm.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 3:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)
>
>
>
> I agree. I’m starting to prepare the announcement blog post (you will see a
> separate thread shortly). My plan was to not highlight the REST upload API
> because it has a known issue, and also list it as a known issue in the
> announcement.
>
> From there we should put STORM-813 in the 0.10.1 queue and start planning for
> a 0.10.1 release soon.
>
> -Taylor
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 8, 2015, at 4:32 PM, 임정택 <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> OK, I see your point.
>>
>> I know Storm 0.10.0 is postponed several times, and it already has very
>> huge changeset.
>> I don't mean to say we have to postpone again, just want to hear
>> opinion that we're OK to release with know issue, or fix it ASAP and reopen
>> vote.
>>
>> I'm +1 (non-binding) with describing known issue to release note so that
>> users don't meet strange behavior without information.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>
>>
>> 2015년 6월 9일 화요일, P. Taylor Goetz<ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성한 메시지:
>>
>>
>> I’m +1 for moving forward with the current release candidate. I think we
>>> can address STORM-813 in a follow-up bug fix/maintenance release (soon).
>>>
>>> In the big picture, the REST upload API is just one of many, many
>>> features/improvements added in 0.10.0, and we’ve not leveraged it in any
>>> way yet (i.e. in Storm UI). I don’t think it should block the release.
>>>
>>> -Taylor
>>>
>>> On Jun 6, 2015, at 2:16 AM, 임정택 <kabh...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately I found a bug from uploadTopology REST API.
>>>> (Sorry I participated to review that feature but I didn't think about
>>>> multiple arguments.)
>>>>
>>>> Here's my checklist.
>>>>
>>>> - test passed : OK
>>>> -- extract source tar
>>>> -- build via "mvn clean install”
>>>> - topology tests via storm-starter : OK
>>>> -- run WordCounts and RollingTopWords, local mode and remote mode
>>>> - test REST APIs (upload / activate / deactivate / kill) : FAIL
>>>> -- activate / deactivate / kill works fine
>>>> -- upload topology fails with multiple arguments
>>>> -- filed issue to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-853
>>>>
>>>> Uploading topology is a new feature, so I'd like to include fixed version
>>>> of feature to 0.10.0.
>>>> (https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/581 is ready for the fix.)
>>>>
>>>> Btw, STORM-813 (correcting storm-starter's README) is related to 0.10.0
>>>> so
>>>
>>> I'd like to include it, but just applying it to Github repo could be
>>>> acceptable.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>>
>>>> 2015-06-06 7:59 GMT+09:00 Kishorkumar Patil <kpa...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1. LGTM. I built and ran some tests.
>>>>> -Kishor
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, June 5, 2015 4:38 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com
>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The v0.10.0 tag was already updates as part of the release process. The
>>>>> release candidate was built from that tag.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Taylor
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 5, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> I checked out the code, built it and ran the tests. Once the vote
>>>>>> passes we need to be sure to update the v0.10.0 tag to point to the
>>>>> correct
>>>
>>> release version in git.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Bobby
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, June 5, 2015 2:54 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@apache.org
>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Full list of changes in this release:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v0.10.0:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=b8aba80e2259f3e12493a871b1af4f69864d40c2;hb=33d6c74041c286eb8b30b26bd0d6a76aa81a667f
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/apache-storm-0.10.0-rc2/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1016
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.10.0
>>>>>> [ ] 0 No opinion
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Taylor
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Name : 임 정택
>>>> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
>>>> Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
>>>> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Name : 임 정택
>> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
>> Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
>> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
