[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Robert Joseph Evans resolved STORM-1084. ---------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.11.0 Thanks [~jerrypeng], I just merged this into master. Keep up the good work. > Improve Storm config validation process to use java annotations instead of > *_SCHEMA format > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: STORM-1084 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1084 > Project: Apache Storm > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: storm-core > Reporter: Boyang Jerry Peng > Assignee: Boyang Jerry Peng > Fix For: 0.11.0 > > > So currently we specify validators: > public static final String STORM_MESSAGING_NETTY_MIN_SLEEP_MS = > "storm.messaging.netty.min_wait_ms"; > public static final Object STORM_MESSAGING_NETTY_MIN_SLEEP_MS_SCHEMA = > ConfigValidation.IntegerValidator; > A better way to do this is using annotations. Something like: > @isInteger > public static final String STORM_MESSAGING_NETTY_MIN_SLEEP_MS = > "storm.messaging.netty.min_wait_ms"; > Do this has many advantages. For one you can stack multiple annotations: > @isInteger > @NotNull > public static final String STORM_MESSAGING_NETTY_MIN_SLEEP_MS = > "storm.messaging.netty.min_wait_ms"; > And we can pass parameters into the annotations: > @isPositiveInteger(includeZero = true) > public static final String DRPC_REQUEST_TIMEOUT_SECS = > "drpc.request.timeout.secs"; > instead of having to write another validator: > ConfigValidation.NonNegativeIntegerValidator for including zero > Also can pass in multiple validators to validate entries in lists or key and > values in maps: > @isNoDuplicateInList > @NotNull > @isListEntryCustom(entryValidatorClasses={IntegerValidator.class,PositiveNumberValidator.class}) > public static final String SUPERVISOR_SLOTS_PORTS = "supervisor.slots.ports"; > Users can pass in any number of validators to @isListEntryCustom and > validation process I have implemented will validate every entry in the list > with every validator. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)