[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14990347#comment-14990347
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1170:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user zhuoliu opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/859

    [STORM-1170] Fix the producer alive issue in DisruptorQueueTest

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/zhuoliu/storm 1170

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/859.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #859
    
----
commit 77aa363ddf9de8a1bd0a11e86ee29c1c283424c2
Author: zhuol <[email protected]>
Date:   2015-11-04T20:24:18Z

    [STORM-1170] Fix the producer alive issue in DisruptoQueueTest

----


> Consistent Unit Test failure in Travis in 
> backtype.storm.utils.DisruptorQueueTest
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-1170
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1170
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Boyang Jerry Peng
>            Priority: Minor
>
> testInOrder(backtype.storm.utils.DisruptorQueueTest)  Time elapsed: 2.141 sec 
>  <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: producer 0 is still alive
>       at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:57)
>       at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:22)
>       at junit.framework.Assert.assertFalse(Assert.java:39)
>       at junit.framework.TestCase.assertFalse(TestCase.java:210)
>       at 
> backtype.storm.utils.DisruptorQueueTest.run(DisruptorQueueTest.java:112)
>       at 
> backtype.storm.utils.DisruptorQueueTest.testInOrder(DisruptorQueueTest.java:83)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to