> On Nov 11, 2015, at 2:04 AM, Cody Innowhere <e.neve...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> During migration, it's probably easiest to operate with two local clones > of the Apache Storm repo: one for working (i.e. checked out to working > branch) > and one for reference/copying (i.e. checked out to > "jstorm-import"). > Do you mean two storm branches(both clojure core) or one storm branch with > one JStorm-imported branch?
That paragraph was mainly me thinking out loud, and probably could have been left out. I meant that as a developer working on merging two divergent branches branches, it might be easiest to have two local copies of the repo to do comparisons, diffs, etc., rather than working in one repo and having to constantly switch between branches. That’s just the way I would likely do it. Ultimately it’s up to each individual developer’s personal preference. -Taylor
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
