[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15007394#comment-15007394
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-876:
--------------------------------------
Github user redsanket commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/845#issuecomment-157180530
storm.thrift:
enum AccessControlType {
OTHER = 1,
USER = 2
//eventually ,GROUP=3
}
Would it be better to remove this comment and create a JIRA for adding group
support instead? In the JIRA, we could point to this spot in the code as a
hint.
@derek -> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1166
> Dist Cache: Basic Functionality
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: STORM-876
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-876
> Project: Apache Storm
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: storm-core
> Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
> Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans
> Attachments: DISTCACHE.md, DistributedCacheDesignDocument.pdf
>
>
> Basic functionality for the Dist Cache feature.
> As part of this a new API should be added to support uploading and
> downloading dist cache items. storm-core.ser, storm-conf.ser and storm.jar
> should be written into the blob store instead of residing locally. We need a
> default implementation of the blob store that does essentially what nimbus
> currently does and does not need anything extra. But having an HDFS backend
> too would be great for scalability and HA.
> The supervisor should provide a way to download and manage these blobs and
> provide a working directory for the worker process with symlinks to the
> blobs. It should also allow the blobs to be updated and switch the symlink
> atomically to point to the new blob once it is downloaded.
> All of this is already done by code internal to Yahoo! we are in the process
> of getting it ready to push back to open source shortly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
