Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/838#issuecomment-157914621
@knusbaum Nice documentation! Thank you.
Some thoughts on documentation improvements (please correct me if I'm
wrong):
1. Since pacemaker is a single node service, what happens in the event it
goes down or gets separated by a network partition?
2. How does it compare to the default zookeeper-backed implementation
(performance, fault tolerance, how requirements, etc.).
Documentation can make or break adoption of a new feature/API/etc.
I'm +1 for merging this with the current documentation. +2 if the points
above are addresses or a follow-up JIRA is created.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
