[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15085141#comment-15085141
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1419:
---------------------------------------
Github user harshach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/977#discussion_r48933699
--- Diff:
external/storm-solr/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/solr/bolt/SolrUpdateBolt.java
---
@@ -92,11 +94,19 @@ private void ack(Tuple tuple) throws
SolrServerException, IOException {
if (commitStgy == null) {
collector.ack(tuple);
} else {
- toCommitTuples.add(tuple);
- commitStgy.update();
- if (commitStgy.commit()) {
+ if (TupleUtils.isTick(tuple)) {
+ LOG.debug("TICK! forcing solr client commit");
+ collector.ack(tuple);
--- End diff --
no need for tick tuples to be acked. We've similar thing in storm-hive and
we don't ack tick tuples.
> Solr bolt should handle tick tuples
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: STORM-1419
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1419
> Project: Apache Storm
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: storm-solr
> Reporter: Xin Wang
> Assignee: Xin Wang
>
> Solr bolt should handle tick tuples.
> Forcing solr client commit when bolt received tick tuple.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
