Thanks for all your comments, I'll do that and make sure it remains compatible
with Java 7.
--Reza
On Monday, January 11, 2016 6:14 PM, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 to Kyle.
Personally I was seeing many places that uses JRE 7, and some places even
uses JRE 6 yet.
Let's keep JDK 7 compatible, but borrow JDK 1.8's interface so that we can
easily migrate later.
Thanks,
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:43 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for Derek and Kyle's comments.
>
> I think it's important to keep at least one level of JVM backward
> compatibility. I would love to dive straight in to JDK 1.8+, but that would
> be at the expense of users who may have infrastructure constraints that
> would prevent that.
>
> As mentioned earlier it is possible to mimick those features and APIs, and
> help pave the way for migration later. I'd be +1 for that approach.
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Jan 11, 2016, at 5:56 PM, Kyle Nusbaum <knusb...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > I agree with Derek.
> > There are still a lot of people using Java 7. However, if you could make
> it sort of Java 8 compatible so that when we do move to Java 8 we can do so
> with relative ease.
> > -- Kyle
> >
> > On Monday, January 11, 2016 4:46 PM, Derek Dagit
> <der...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I am not sure it makes sense to move to Java 8 merely because of the
> clojure->java translation, but it might be good timing so I would be OK
> with it.
> >
> > --
> > Derek
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Reza Farivar <rfari...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>
> > To: Dev <dev@storm.apache.org>
> > Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 4:40 PM
> > Subject: Java 8 for Storm 2.x?
> >
> > I have started work on translating the util.clj to java (STORM-1226). I
> see some instances when translating the functional behavior of clojure to
> Java requires code that is already part of java 8.
> > For instance, there are many cases where a predicate function is passed
> around (e.g. in find-first). I can go ahead and implement a Predicate
> interface and use that, but Java 8 has already exactly that functionality
> implemented.
> > Would it make sense to move to Java 8 for the post-clojure branch 2.x?
> > --Reza
> >
> >
>
--
Name : Jungtaek Lim
Blog : http://medium.com/@heartsavior
Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
