[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15139213#comment-15139213
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1336:
---------------------------------------
Github user zhuoliu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1053#discussion_r52338605
--- Diff: conf/defaults.yaml ---
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ topology.state.checkpoint.interval.ms: 1000
# topology priority describing the importance of the topology in
decreasing importance starting from 0 (i.e. 0 is the highest priority and the
priority importance decreases as the priority number increases).
# Recommended range of 0-29 but no hard limit set.
topology.priority: 29
-topology.component.resources.onheap.memory.mb: 128.0
+topology.component.resources.onheap.memory.mb: 256.0
--- End diff --
Do we have a reason for doubling the default per-instance memory usage?
> Evalute/Port JStorm cgroup support
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: STORM-1336
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1336
> Project: Apache Storm
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: storm-core
> Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
> Assignee: Boyang Jerry Peng
> Labels: jstorm-merger
>
> Supports controlling the upper limit of CPU core usage for a worker using
> cgroups
> Sounds like a good start, will be nice to integrate it with RAS requests too.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
