Lets just do an RC2. I really would like to spend some time and try to do a
more complete test of a 1.0.0 release. No matter what happens we will likely
have a 1.0.1 soon, but I would prefer to beat on it and do some perf testing
before we release it to the world.
- Bobby
On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 4:04 AM, Julien Nioche
<lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
What about including user@ in this discussion? Users' votes are non binding
but it is a good way of getting more people to test the RCs. This is common
practice in other Apache projects
Julien
On 5 April 2016 at 00:05, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We're releasing the first major version, so I'd like to make it less
> error-prone as possible.
> Moreover no one except me test and vote. Seems like voting in weekend
> doesn't work.
>
> Let's have RC2 and participate voting.
>
> Thanks,
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>
> 2016년 4월 5일 (화) 오전 6:29, Harsha <st...@harsha.io>님이 작성:
>
> > Taylor,
> > Lets do another release build since we have other jiras merged
> > in .
> > Thanks,
> > Harsha
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, at 02:07 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> > > FYI I’ve merged fixes for following to the 1.x-branch:
> > > * STORM-1670: LocalState#get(String) can throw FileNotFoundException
> > > which may result supervisor.clj#sync-processes stop assigning new
> > > workers/assignments
> > > * STORM-1677: Test resource files are excluded from source
> distribution,
> > > which makes logviewer-test failing
> > >
> > > Still waiting to hear opinions on whether we should cancel this vote
> and
> > > cut a new RC.
> > >
> > > I’m leaning toward a new RC at this point.
> > >
> > > -Taylor
> > >
> > > > On Apr 4, 2016, at 11:50 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The question at this point is whether we want to cancel the release
> > vote and cut a new RC, or move forward with this one.
> > > >
> > > > I don’t see the test issue as critical — users will still be able to
> > build the software with the `-DskipTests=true` flag. I also feel that
> once
> > the 1.0 release is out we will go into a phase where we release updates
> > (e.g. 1.0.x, 1.x) at a relatively rapid rate.
> > > >
> > > > I could go either way. What does everyone else think?
> > > >
> > > > -Taylor
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> On Apr 2, 2016, at 10:51 PM, Harsha <m...@harsha.io> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> For rc2 please include STORM-1670 as well. Source distribution is
> > > >> important as well.
> > > >> -Harsha
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016, at 01:02 AM, Jungtaek Lim wrote:
> > > >>> Here's my test,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> - testing with source distribution : FAIL
> > > >>> - unzip : OK
> > > >>> - building from source dist : FAIL
> > > >>> - how to build: running `mvn -P all-tests clean install` on
> > unzipped
> > > >>> source dist.
> > > >>> - Test resource files (.log) are excluded from source
> distribution,
> > > >>> which makes logviewer-test failing.
> > > >>> - filed issue :
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1677
> > > >>> and
> > > >>> submit a patch via pull request
> > > >>> - after applying PR, tests are all passed.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> - testing with binary distribution (one machine) : OK
> > > >>> - launch daemons : OK
> > > >>> - run RollingTopWords (local) : OK (with minor issue)
> > > >>> - process doesn't terminate until killing manually or pressing
> > Ctrl +
> > > >>> C
> > > >>> - run RollingTopWords (remote) : OK
> > > >>> - activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill : OK
> > > >>> - logviewer (worker dir, daemon dir) : OK
> > > >>> - change log level : OK
> > > >>> - thread dump, heap dump, restart worker : OK
> > > >>> - run WordCountTopology (remote) : OK
> > > >>> - multiple workers and multi-lang bolt
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Minor but just leaving note: I saw /log (logviewer) throwing HTTP
> > STATUS
> > > >>> 500 sometimes, but I can't reproduce it. At that time, deep-search
> > > >>> doesn't
> > > >>> work at that topology, too.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Total
> > > >>> - source distribution: -1
> > > >>> - binary distribution: +1
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I don't know how it is important to build with source distribution,
> > but
> > > >>> we
> > > >>> can address STORM-1677 and initiate voting RC2 immediately although
> > we
> > > >>> think it's a 'blocker' issue.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 2016년 4월 2일 (토) 오전 8:50, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@apache.org>님이
> 작성:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 1.0.0 (rc1)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Full list of changes in this release:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=787e4a6c375d290f724e59b3d8ebe34806ccd0d5
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v1.0.0:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=45b1b148401fd05f0f79cc7abdf6b5c7fc43df20;hb=d02f94268dec229d1125a24fdf53fa303cbc2b29
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.0.0/apache-storm-1.0.0-src.tar.gz
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.0.0/
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1027/
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 1.0.0.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 1.0.0
> > > >>>> [ ] 0 No opinion
> > > >>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release. This is a
> major
> > > >>>> milestone of which we should all be proud.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> This is not an April fools joke. ;)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> -Taylor
> > > >>>>
> > > >
> > >
> > > Email had 1 attachment:
> > > + signature.asc
> > > 1k (application/pgp-signature)
> >
>
--
*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
http://www.digitalpebble.com
http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
#digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
