[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15270393#comment-15270393
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1700:
---------------------------------------

Github user abhishekagarwal87 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1324#discussion_r62013271
  
    --- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/daemon/StormCommon.java ---
    @@ -383,10 +384,16 @@ public static void addEventLogger(Map conf, 
StormTopology topology) {
                 for (Map<String, Object> info : registerInfo) {
                     String className = (String) info.get("class");
                     Object argument = info.get("argument");
    +                Integer maxRetainMetricTuples = 
Utils.getInt(info.get("max.retain.metric.tuples"), 100);
    --- End diff --
    
    let the default come from defaults.yaml


> Introduce 'whitelist' / 'blacklist' option to MetricsConsumer
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-1700
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1700
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: storm-core
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Jungtaek Lim
>            Assignee: Jungtaek Lim
>
> Storm provides various metrics by default, and so on some external modules 
> (storm-kafka).
> When we register MetricsConsumer, MetricsConsumer should handle all of 
> metrics. If MetricsConsumer cannot keep up with these metrics, only way to 
> keep up is increasing parallelism, which seems limited. Furthermore, some 
> users don't want to care about some metrics since unintended metrics will 
> fill external storage.
> Though MetricsConsumer itself can filter metrics by name, it would be better 
> to support filter by Storm side. It will reduce the redundant works for Storm 
> community.
> If we provide filter options, it would be great.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to