http://hortonworks.com/blog/microbenchmarking-storm-1-0-performance/
-roshan On 11/4/16, 7:13 AM, "Paul Poulosky" <[email protected]> wrote: >IEEE Xplore Document - Benchmarking Streaming Computation Engines: Storm, >Flink and Spark Streaming > > >| >| | >IEEE Xplore Document - Benchmarking Streaming Computation Engines: Storm, >Flink and Spark Streaming > Streaming data processing has been gaining attention due to its >application into a wide range of scenarios. To s... | | > > | > > > > >Benchmarking Streaming Computation Engines at Yahoo! > > >| >| >| >| | | > > | > > | >| >| | >Benchmarking Streaming Computation Engines at Yahoo! > (Yahoo Storm Team in alphabetical order) Sanket Chintapalli, Derek >Dagit, Bobby Evans, Reza Farivar, Tom Graves,... | | > > | > > | > > > > > > On Friday, November 4, 2016 6:05 AM, Dominik Safaric ><[email protected]> wrote: > > > >1- What do you mean "able to control message size"? Is it >max-pending-spout parameter? > >By using for example Kafka as your source of information of the benchmark >topology, you may produce i.e. control the size of messages in terms of >bytes length. Why would you want to do this? Because there is a relation >between certain performance characteristics such as throughput and >message size. > >Is there any published benchmark like this old-one here: > >As far up to my knowledge, no. However, we at the Web Information Systems >research group of the Delft University of Technology are currently in the >process of benchmarking several streaming engines (including Storm) part >of an empirical research. If you¹d like to here more about the insight so >far gathered, feel free to email me. > >On 4 Nov 2016, at 10:02, Walid Aljoby <[email protected]> wrote: >Thank you Dominik. I have two more points, please.1- What do you mean >"able to control message size"? Is it max-pending-spout parameter?2- Is >there any published benchmark like this old-one here: >https://github.com/stormprocessor/storm-benchmark/commit/22bd17a81020ceef7 >1ed73168ac89d3f8eaf61e2 >Best Regards,Walid > > From: Dominik Safaric <[email protected]> > To: Walid Aljoby <[email protected]> >Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; >"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 4:53 PM > Subject: Re: Storm benchmarks > >Well, this depends onto the aspects of the measurements. >You may for example define a topology consisting of a spout, >transformation bolt and sink that receives byte arrays from Kafka, >transforms them and outputs. The nice thing is that you¹d be able to >control for the size of the messages. >In addition, if you care about the performance in conjunction to stateful >operations such as aggregations, your topology might look alike the for >example WordCount topology. >Regards,Dominik > >On 4 Nov 2016, at 09:50, Walid Aljoby <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Dominik, >Many thanks for details. Actually I am looking for a set typologies for >my test. >Thank you again,--RegardsWalid > > From: Dominik Safaric <[email protected]> > To: [email protected]; Walid Aljoby <[email protected]> >Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 4:41 PM > Subject: Re: Storm benchmarks > >Hi Walid, >You may benchmark Storm¹s performance in terms of throughput and >end-to-end latency for example. In addition, the investigation could also >include variances in the configurational settings, such as the >parallelism, message size, intra-worker and inter-worker buffer size >which some of them have a profound effect onto the performance of Storm. >There are already a few benchmarks of Storm¹s performance such as: >https://developer.ibm.com/streamsdev/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2014/04/S >treams-and-Storm-April-2014-Final.pdf >In addition, you may want to take a look at the academic paper >Storm@Twitter and Twitter Heron: Stream processing at scale which >describe among others certain performance aspects of Storm that might be >helpful to you when designing the benchmark. >Regards,Dominik > >On 4 Nov 2016, at 09:36, Walid Aljoby <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Everyone, >Anyone please could tell what are the common benchmarks for testing Storm >performance? >Thank you,--Regards >WA > > > > > > > > > > > >
