Thanks for thorough review. It's a great example of what a good review looks 
like.

Comments in line below.

-Taylor

> On Jan 31, 2017, at 11:33 PM, Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
>> source
> 
> - verify file (signature, MD5, SHA)
> -- source, tar.gz : OK
> -- source, zip : OK
> 
> - extract file
> -- source, tar.gz : OK
> -- source, zip : OK
> 
> - diff-ing extracted files between tar.gz and zip : OK
> 
> - build source with JDK 7
> -- source, tar.gz : OK
> 
> - build source dist
> -- source, tar.gz : OK
> 
> - build binary dist
> -- source, tar.gz : OK
> 
>> binary
> 
> - verify file (signature, MD5, SHA)
> -- binary, tar.gz : OK
> -- binary, zip : OK
> 
> - extract file
> -- source, tar.gz : OK
> -- source, zip : OK
> 
> - diff-ing extracted files between tar.gz and zip : OK
> 
> - launch daemons : OK
> - run RollingTopWords (local) : OK
> - run RollingTopWords (remote) : OK
> - activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill : OK
> - logviewer (worker dir, daemon dir) : OK
> - change log level : OK
>  - thread dump, heap dump, restart worker : OK
> - log search : OK
> - run WordCountTopology (multilang, remote) : OK
> - run StatefulTopology (local) : OK
> - run StatefulTopology (remote) : OK
> - run StatefulWindowingTopology (remote) : OK
> 
> Found two bugs here which are not blocker:
> 
> 1. visualization: it doesn't show graph correctly while worker is being
> initializing, and below error message is printed on console, which I think
> is long-lasting bug.
> 

I think this has been around for a while. I agree that it's not a blocker.

> 2. running topology with local cluster doesn't terminate after cluster
> shutdown: Took stack trace, and found some non-daemon threads are live:
> Async Localizer, Localizer Cache Cleanup x 2.

Local mode or a single node cluster?

I saw this when testing the worker shutdown hook bug in local mode. I don't 
think this is a blocker, but we should definitely follow up with a JIRA. This 
could affect users who rely on local mode for integration tests.

> 
> I'll file two issues afterwards.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> 
> 2017년 2월 1일 (수) 오전 5:55, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]>님이 작성:
> 
>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 1.0.3 (rc1)
>> 
>> Full list of changes in this release:
>> 
>> 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=6cb735d18ec11eccd3e80bab8f879c989a9b3967;hb=a81ec2580fce1f2ee6349a9028dcb75763798bec
>> 
>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v1.0.3:
>> 
>> 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;h=b8adddc6aa20107288e59cba6a2976c0951742fb;hb=a81ec2580fce1f2ee6349a9028dcb75763798bec
>> 
>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>> 
>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.0.3-rc1/apache-storm-1.0.3-src.tar.gz
>> 
>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.0.3-rc1/
>> 
>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> 
>> 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>> 
>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1043
>> 
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 1.0.3.
>> 
>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>> 
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 1.0.3
>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> 
>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>> 
>> -Taylor

Reply via email to