Github user arunmahadevan commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2218
  
    This builds on top of the existing state checkpointing mechanism 
(documented here - 
https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/docs/State-checkpointing.md). 
Theres nothing extra added to the underlying checkpointing mechanism itself and 
its pretty straightforward. 
    
    The tuples in window (think a FIFO queue) are split into multiple 
partitions so that they are more manageable and can be distributed/sharded via 
the underlying key-value state (redis/hbase etc). The modified partitions are 
saved during a checkpoint. During iteration the partition are loaded on demand 
from the underlying state backend as they are accessed. A subset of the most 
recently used partitions are cached in memory (backed by a guava Loading Cache).
    
    During checkpoint, the following are saved :
    1. Any modified or newly created window partitions.
    2. Any state needed to recover the Trigger/Eviction policies.
    3. State thats exposed to the user where the user may have saved some 
values.
    
    Since the KV state does not guarantee any specific ordering of the keys 
during iteration, a separate structure is maintained to store the ordered 
partition Ids which is used during iteration to retrieve the partitions in 
order. This is also saved during the checkpoint.
    
    The above mechanism kicks in only if user choses to use the windowed state 
persistence, otherwise the current behavior (keeping the tuples in an in-memory 
queue) is retained.
    
    I would like to capture the design details in the PR/Documentation itself 
as far as possible than adding it in separate docs which tend to get lost.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to