Thanks all for the quick turnaround! Here's my +1 (binding).

> source

- verify file (signature, MD5, SHA)
-- source, tar.gz : OK
-- source, zip : OK

- extract file
-- source, tar.gz : OK
-- source, zip : OK

- diff-ing extracted files between tar.gz and zip : OK

- build source with JDK 8 (-Pall-tests && -Pexternals)
-- source, tar.gz : OK

- build source dist
-- source, tar.gz : OK

- build binary dist
-- source, tar.gz : OK

> binary

- verify file (signature, MD5, SHA)
-- binary, tar.gz : OK
-- binary, zip : OK

- extract file
-- binary, tar.gz : OK
-- binary, zip : OK

- diff-ing extracted files between tar.gz and zip : OK

- launch daemons : OK

- run RollingTopWords (local) : OK

- run RollingTopWords (remote) : OK
  - activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill : OK
  - logviewer (worker dir, daemon dir) :OK
  - change log level : OK
  - thread dump, heap dump, restart worker : OK
  - log search :OK

Note that "profiling worker" and "topology log search" works now which were
failing in RC1.

Thanks,
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

2018년 10월 11일 (목) 오전 3:02, Stig Rohde Døssing <[email protected]>님이 작성:

> +1
>
> Built and ran unit tests from the tag.
> Ran ExclamationTopology locally using the Storm tar, verified that UI looks
> as expected, that logviewer works, and that there were no errors in the
> logs.
> Verified the signature and SHA512 for the source and binary tars.
>
> We should consider deleting the md5 files, Apache's release policy
> recommends against including them in a release
> https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums.
>
>
> Den ons. 10. okt. 2018 kl. 17.02 skrev Bobby Evans <[email protected]>:
>
> > +1
> >
> > built and ran all of the unit tests from the tag.
> > Ran some small perf tests on a single node cluster.  Things look really
> > good there.
> >
> >
> > On a side note our CI pipeline has been running and passing builds very
> > close to this release too.  (we are following master currently) and it is
> > looking good.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bobby
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 4:02 PM Kishorkumar Patil <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1  to release this package.
> > >
> > > I ran basic tests, and fucntionality tested manually some of the UI
> > > features and profiling issues reported as part of the blockers. I did
> not
> > > notice any silent failures either - or any failures/exception in the
> > logs.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > -Kishor
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 4:05 PM P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc2)
> > > >
> > > > Full list of changes in this release:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc2/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> > > >
> > > > The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=f8d04910dc3fd14534c186232ecf7882d8916f67;hb=f8d04910dc3fd14534c186232ecf7882d8916f67
> > > >
> > > > The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc2/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
> > > >
> > > > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> > > >
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc2/
> > > >
> > > > The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> > > >
> > > > The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> > > >
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1071
> > > >
> > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
> > > >
> > > > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> > > >
> > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
> > > > [ ]  0 No opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> > > >
> > > > -Taylor
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to