Thanks, that makes sense. I agree that we should proceed with the upgrade.
On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 11:03, rzo1 (via GitHub) <g...@apache.org> wrote: > > > rzo1 commented on PR #3680: > URL: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3680#issuecomment-2572878166 > > Slf4j2 using another binding mechanismn for the log implementation. Some > people do shading before submitting a topology, so if you have for example > the wrong log4j2-slf4j binding in your configuring, you might end without > logging. Although, people should actually use it as provided Dependency, so > perhaps it won't be a big deal. > > > -- > This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. > To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the > URL above to go to the specific comment. > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@storm.apache.org > > For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: > us...@infra.apache.org >
