Hello @Richard Zowalla We can consider releasing 3.0.0 over the next week or so.
On Sun, 10 May 2026 at 23:09, Rui Abreu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the PRs @Richard Zowalla , much appreciated. > I have merged them and dealt with the subsequent dependabot avalanche. > Apologies if you received a whole bunch of Jenkins errors. > I was using AI + GH client to deal with the dependabot PRs in batches > and it was being quite helpful, right up until the point and it > decided to merge a few PRs whose tests were still ongoing > > problematic Merges > * #8632 (Jersey 4.0.2 upgrade on 2.x) > * #8615 (Checkstyle 13.4.2 on master) > > Both have been reverted and both master and 2.x are ok. > > I'll create a RC for 2.8.8 during the week. > > On Sun, 10 May 2026 at 17:01, Rui Abreu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Ok, we can hold off on 3.0.0 for now. > > I'll focus on making sure 2.8.8 has the necessary changeset and then we can > > get the RC going. > > > > On Sun, May 10, 2026, 16:58 Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> 2.8.8 is fine for me. Guess we need to confirmed dependabot for 2.x > >> branches too (+ license update action) > >> > >> 3.0.0 would need the Java 21 bump before (as discussed in the related > >> discussion - dont know if there are other things like the Jitter RFC stuff > >> for it) - perhaps there is something else. > >> > >> Gruß > >> Richard > >> > >> > Am 10.05.2026 um 17:13 schrieb Rui Abreu <[email protected]>: > >> > > >> > Hi folks, > >> > > >> > Just trying to understand if you are keen on performing a release for > >> > both > >> > versions shortly
