Yep. Something is wrong with that tag, at least on Github. I suspect it has 
something to do with a name collision between the 0.9.0 *tag* and an existing 
0.9.0 *branch*.

I will sort this out today. There is also an issue with the fact that the 
release was inadvertently built against Java 7.

Looks like another release is in order.

Thanks for pointing this out Jon.

- Taylor


On Dec 5, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Jon Logan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Apologizes if this is a stupid question, but is the Github repository 
> branch/tag correct..? I think that the 0.9.0 tag/branch is not actually what 
> is in this release? The last activity on that branch was PR #722, and per 
> Github, it's quite far from the master. The last change was nearly 3 weeks 
> ago...
> 
> https://github.com/nathanmarz/storm/tree/0.9.0
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:51 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> wrote:
> CORRECTION: The HREF for the release tag link was wrong, and there was a 
> paragraph erroneously describing this release as a release candidate. This is 
> a FINAL release.
> 
> Corrected announcement below:
> 
> 
> The Storm team is pleased to announce the release of Storm version 0.9.0.
> 
> NOTE: This release is neither a top-level Apache release nor an Apache 
> Incubator release. Storm will now migrate to the Apache release process. 
> Version 0.9.1 will be the first Apache incubator release.
> 
> Storm is a distributed, fault-tolerant, and high-performance realtime 
> computation system that provides strong guarantees on the processing of data. 
> Additional information is available at the following URLS:
> 
> http://storm-project.net/
> https://github.com/nathanmarz/storm
> 
> Downloads of binary distributions are listed in the downloads section:
> 
> http://storm-project.net/downloads.html
> 
> JAR artifacts can be found at clojars.org:
> 
> https://clojars.org/storm
> 
> The tag for this release can be found on github:
> 
> https://github.com/nathanmarz/storm/tree/0.9.0
> 
> 
> Changes since 0.9.0-rc3
> * Fixed a netty client issue where sleep times for reconnection could be 
> negative (thanks brndnmtthws)
> * Fixed an issue that would cause storm-netty unit tests to fail
> 
> - Taylor
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to