Hi guys
Just wondering if was anybody able to look at this ? As we're just not
sure if we are setup incorrectly or if there are issues in the autoscaler.
Thanks again
David
-----Original Message-----
From: David Waddell [mailto:david.wadd...@owmobility.com]
Sent: 08 August 2014 16:22
To: Akila Ravihansa Perera
Cc: dev@stratos.apache.org; Shaheed Haque
Subject: RE: autoscaler issue with multiple cartridges + subscriptions
Guys
Shaheed has been in transit so I'm not sure when he will be able to answer.
Akila - I diff'd the scaling.drl file from github against ours and they are
the same. Debug logging was not on the for the rules, perhaps this lead to your
query.
I've tried again today to look at this; running various combinations , I only
ever see one of my cartridge subscriptions enter the auto scaling rule.
I think there may be race conditions/ mismodelling in the way the
NetworkPartitionContext object is being used. I may have misunderstood it but
here goes :
1) There is a cluster per cartridge subscription and the clusters
(subscriptions) are all using the same NetworkPartitionContext Instance in our
example (N1).
2) Aggregate perf data when received for cluster, is written into
NetworkPartionContext instance.
3) A cluster monitor exists for each cluster, each on its own thread
and sleep for 60 seconds between checks.
So 2 issues
a) A cluster monitor may pick up stats for a cluster other than
it's own, as these can be overwritten by another cluster's data being written
into the NetworkPartitionContext
b) As ClusterMonitor instances share the same
NetworkPartitionContext, the first ClusterMonitor to wake from it's sleep will
set reset=false in the NetworkPartitionContext.
Preventing subsequent clusters from evaluating rules.
Is it possible we are misconfigured and should not have multiple
subscriptions in a network partition ? Or are these genuine issues ?
Thanks
David.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Waddell
Sent: 06 August 2014 16:40
To: 'Akila Ravihansa Perera'
Cc: dev@stratos.apache.org; Shaheed Haque
Subject: RE: autoscaler issue with multiple cartridges + subscriptions
Hi Akila
Please find the rule attached.
Product version -
netiq@octl-01:/opt/wso2/apache-stratos$ cat bin/version.txt Apache Stratos
v4.0.0 netiq@octl-01:/opt/wso2/apache-stratos$ cat ./bin/wso2carbon-version.txt
WSO2 Carbon Framework v4.2.0
Shaheed - can you comment on the build origin ?
Thanks
David.
-----Original Message-----
From: Akila Ravihansa Perera [mailto:raviha...@wso2.com]
Sent: 06 August 2014 16:28
To: David Waddell
Cc: dev@stratos.apache.org; Shaheed Haque
Subject: Re: autoscaler issue with multiple cartridges + subscriptions
Hi David,
Seems like the Drool file for scaling rule (scaling.drl) [1] is different in
the packs that you are working with. Have you made changes to the existing
scaling rule? Could you please tell us the Stratos version you're working with?
(locally built from source, distribution release etc.)
Please share the scaling rule found in
<stratos_path>/repository/conf/scaling.drl
[1]
https://github.com/apache/stratos/blob/4.0.0/products/stratos/modules/distribution/src/main/conf/scaling.drl
Thanks.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:20 PM, David Waddell <david.wadd...@owmobility.com>
wrote:
> .. clarified cartridges/policies inline below..
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Waddell [mailto:david.wadd...@owmobility.com]
> Sent: 06 August 2014 13:46
> To: Akila Ravihansa Perera; dev
> Cc: Shaheed Haque
> Subject: RE: autoscaler issue with multiple cartridges + subscriptions
>
> Hi Guys
> Sorry for delayed reply.
>
> Akila - apologies for confusion on deployment policies - I had tested
> with 2 polices, and the logs show the mix. Logs this time are not, and
> issue exists.
> Cloud-controller.xml attached.
>
> I reproduced this with DEBUG on for scaler. I ran with 2 cartridges,
> opwv-fe with a policy static-1, with min/max instances of 1; and opwv-vos
> with policy autoscale-1-2, min=1/max=2.
>
> When launched I then stressed the CPU on the opwv-vos instance to induce
> scaling.
>
> What I found was (log name in brackets)
> - when only the opwv-vos cartridge is subscribed, scaling did
> occur (wso2carbon.log.singlesub)
> - with the opwv-fe subscribed first, then the opwv-fe cartridge
> subscribed, scaling did not occur (wso2carbon.log.2sub)
> - with the opwv-vos subscribed first, then the opwv-vos, scaling
> did occur (wso2carbon.log.2sub_reverse).
>
> I.e. It appeared the order of subscription creation affects. At a
> rough glance it might be that both are sharing the same
> NetworkPartitionContext instance.
>
> Please let me know if you would like any more detail, and thanks.
>
>
> Rgds
> David
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akila Ravihansa Perera [mailto:raviha...@wso2.com]
> Sent: 01 August 2014 07:58
> To: dev
> Cc: Shaheed Haque
> Subject: Re: autoscaler issue with multiple cartridges + subscriptions
>
> Hi David,
>
> I have few concerns about your deployment policies.
>
> 1. I see only 2 deployment policies defined: static-1, autoscale-1-2 But in
> the cartridge subscription I can see a deployment policy named autoscale-1-5.
> Where did that come from? Can you share your complete deployment
> policy/policies?
>
> 2. In deployment policy autoscale-1-2, you have given the provide as:
> "provider":"openstack-Core". Is this correct? Can you share your
> cloud-controller.xml?
>
> As Nirmal suggested, enabling DEBUG logs will give more insights into what is
> actually causing this issue. It's better if you can enable DEBUG logs for the
> autoscaler package to get the complete picture.
>
> log4j.logger.org.apache.stratos.autoscaler=INFO
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Nirmal Fernando <nirmal070...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Nirmal Fernando
>> <nirmal070...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> Is there any possibility of enabling following logger in the
>>> log4j.properties file ?
>>>
>>> log4j.logger.org.apache.stratos.autoscaler.rule.RuleLog=DEBUG
>>>
>>>
>>> For each service cluster, we run a Cluster Monitor and that is
>>> responsible for monitoring and scaling the cluster.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:56 PM, David Waddell
>>> <david.wadd...@owmobility.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi guys
>>>>
>>>> We’re experiencing an issue on stratos 4.0 - the autoscaler
>>>> doesn’t seem to be kicking in when multiple cartridges are subscribed.
>>>>
>>>> When deploying only one cartridge, the autoscaler works as
>>>> expected .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 3 cartridges are defined : opwv-oam-01, opwv-oam-02, opwv-vos.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> {"displayName":"opwv-vos","description":"opwv-vos
>>>> Cartridge","cartridgeAlias":"-","cartridgeType":"opwv-vos","activeI
>>>> n
>>>> stances":0,"provider":"cisco","version":"1","multiTenant":false,"ho
>>>> s tName":"qmog.cisco.com","loadBalancer":false}
>>>>
>>>> {"displayName":"opwv-oam-01","description":"opwv-oam-01
>>>> Cartridge","cartridgeAlias":"-","cartridgeType":"opwv-oam-01","acti
>>>> v
>>>> eInstances":0,"provider":"cisco","version":"1","multiTenant":false,"
>>>> hostName":"qmog.cisco.com","loadBalancer":false}
>>>>
>>>> {"displayName":"opwv-oam-02","description":"opwv-oam-02
>>>> Cartridge","cartridgeAlias":"-","cartridgeType":"opwv-oam-02","acti
>>>> v
>>>> eInstances":0,"provider":"cisco","version":"1","multiTenant":false,"
>>>> hostName":"qmog.cisco.com","loadBalancer":false}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Deployment policies :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> {"id":"static-1","partitionGroup":[{"id":"N1","partitionAlgo":"one-
>>>> a
>>>> fter-another","partition":[{"id":"RegionOne","partitionMin":1,"part
>>>> i
>>>> tionMax":1,"provider":"openstack-Core","property":[{"name":"region"
>>>> ,
>>>> "value":"RegionOne"}]}]}]}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> {"id":"autoscale-1-2","partitionGroup":[{"id":"N1","partitionAlgo":"
>>>> one-after-another","partition":[{"id":"RegionOne","pa
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> rtitionMin":1,"partitionMax":2,"provider":"openstack-Core","propert
>>>> y ":[{"name":"region","value":"RegionOne"}]}]}]}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Scaling policy :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> {"id":"economyPolicy","loadThresholds":{"requestsInFlight":{"averag
>>>> e
>>>> ":300.0,"secondDerivative":0.0,"gradient":0.0,"scaleDownMarginOfGra
>>>> d
>>>> ient":1.0,"scaleDownMarginOfSecondDerivative":0.2},"memoryConsumpti
>>>> o
>>>> n":{"average":6000.0,"secondDerivative":0.0,"gradient":0.0,"scaleDo
>>>> w
>>>> nMarginOfGradient":1.0,"scaleDownMarginOfSecondDerivative":0.2},"lo
>>>> a
>>>> dAverage":{"average":40.0,"secondDerivative":0.0,"gradient":0.0,"sc
>>>> a
>>>> leDownMarginOfGradient":1.0,"scaleDownMarginOfSecondDerivative":0.2
>>>> }
>>>> }}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If we subscribe cartridge opwv-vos by itself :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> TID: [0] [STRATOS] [2014-07-31 15:15:39,836] INFO
>>>> {org.apache.stratos.manager.manager.CartridgeSubscriptionManager} -
>>>> Successful Subscription: CartridgeSubscription [subscriptionId=0,
>>>> type=opwv-vos, alias=opwv-vos, autoscalingPolicyName=economyPolicy,
>>>> deploymentPolicyName=autoscale-1-5, subscriber=Subscriber
>>>> [adminUserName=admin, tenantId=-1234, tenantDomain=carbon.super],
>>>> repository=Repository [id=0, url=null, userName=,
>>>> isPrivateRepository=false],
>>>> cartridgeInfo=org.apache.stratos.cloud.controller.stub.pojo.Cartrid
>>>> g
>>>> eInfo@5288e5b6,
>>>> payload=SERVICE_NAME=opwv-vos,HOST_NAME=opwv-vos.qmog.cisco.com,MUL
>>>> T
>>>> ITENANT=false,TENANT_ID=-1234,TENANT_RANGE=-1234,CARTRIDGE_ALIAS=op
>>>> w
>>>> v-vos,CLUSTER_ID=opwv-vos.opwv-vos.domain,CARTRIDGE_KEY=J5xTyGg9k1o
>>>> d
>>>> 0Dvl,REPO_URL=null,PORTS=22,PROVIDER=cisco,PUPPET_IP=PUPPET_IP,PUPP
>>>> E
>>>> T_HOSTNAME=PUPPET_HOSTNAME,PUPPET_ENV=PUPPET_ENV,OPWV_INTEGRA_oam_r
>>>> o
>>>> =opwv-oam-02,TRUSTSTORE_PASSWORD=wso2carbon,OPWV_INTEGRA_fe_server_
>>>> t
>>>> ype=VOS,OPWV_INTEGRA_wait_for_hosts=oam01~oam02,CEP_PORT=7611,MONIT
>>>> O
>>>> RING_SERVER_SECURE_PORT=0,NO_CARTRIDGE_SUBSCRIBE=false,MB_PORT=6161
>>>> 6
>>>> ,MB_IP=octl.qmog.cisco.com,CEP_IP=octl.qmog.cisco.com,DEPLOYMENT=de
>>>> f
>>>> ault,OPWV_INTEGRA_region=Core,ENABLE_DATA_PUBLISHER=false,OPWV_INTE
>>>> G
>>>> RA_swap_size=2G,MONITORING_SERVER_ADMIN_PASSWORD=xxxx,MONITORING_SE
>>>> R
>>>> VER_IP=octl.qmog.cisco.com,COMMIT_ENABLED=false,MONITORING_SERVER_A
>>>> D
>>>> MIN_USERNAME=xxxx,OPWV_INTEGRA_oam_server_role=,CERT_TRUSTSTORE=/op
>>>> t
>>>> /apache-stratos-cartridge-agent/security/client-truststore.jks,OPWV
>>>> _
>>>> INTEGRA_oam_server_type=OAMClient,MONITORING_SERVER_PORT=0,OPWV_INT
>>>> E GRA_oam_rw=opwv-oam-01,OPWV_INTEGRA_sys_component=Core~CC,
>>>> cluster=opwv-vos.opwv-vos.domain], subscriptionDomainMap={}
>>>> {org.apache.stratos.manager.manager.CartridgeSubscriptionManager}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> VM is created, we run a stress load on that VM, we see the
>>>> load average increase in aggregator.log, and the autoscaler
>>>> correctly kicks in and spawns a second instance :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> TID: [0] [STRATOS] [2014-07-31 15:24:42,614] INFO
>>>> {org.apache.stratos.autoscaler.rule.RuleLog} - [scale-up]
>>>> Partition available, hence trying to spawn an instance to scale up!
>>>> {org.apache.stratos.autoscaler.rule.RuleLog}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> However when we subscribe all the cartridges together, a
>>>> stress on the op-vos instance does not trigger autoscale (although
>>>> the aggregate log correctly reports the load) .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Logs are attached.
>>>>
>>>> Run with single subscription + successful auto scale is from
>>>> 2014-07-31 16:03:25,320 -> 2014-07-31 16:07:48,220
>>>>
>>>> Run with multiple subscription and no auto scale occurring, is from
>>>> to 2014-07-31 15:59:50,635 -> 2014-07-31 15:50:08,122
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Apologies for hitting the dev list but there doesn’t appear to
>>>> be a user list; If anyone can take a look appreciated J
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> David.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Nirmal
>>>
>>> Nirmal Fernando.
>>> PPMC Member & Committer of Apache Stratos, Senior Software Engineer,
>>> WSO2 Inc.
>>>
>>> Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Nirmal
>>
>> Nirmal Fernando.
>> PPMC Member & Committer of Apache Stratos, Senior Software Engineer,
>> WSO2 Inc.
>>
>> Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> --
> Akila Ravihansa Perera
> Software Engineer
> WSO2 Inc.
> http://wso2.com
>
> Phone: +94 77 64 154 38
> Blog: http://ravihansa3000.blogspot.com
>
--
Akila Ravihansa Perera
Software Engineer
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com
Phone: +94 77 64 154 38
Blog: http://ravihansa3000.blogspot.com
