[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Imesh Gunaratne updated STRATOS-968:
------------------------------------
    Description: 
Currently in the messaging component there is no abstraction found between the 
message broker transport and messaging implementation. All the 
publisher/subscriber/listener classes are directly referring MQTT library 
classes.

IMO it would be better to have such abstraction because it will allow us to 
switch to a different transport with less effort without having to update the 
entire messaging component.

  was:
Currently in the messaging component there is no abstraction found between the 
message broker transport and its implementation. All the 
publisher/subscriber/listener classes are directly referring MQTT library 
classes.

IMO it would be better to have such abstraction because it will allow us to 
switch to a different transport with less effort without having to update the 
entire messaging component.


> Introduce an Abstraction between Message Broker Transport and Messaging 
> Component Implementation
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STRATOS-968
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-968
>             Project: Stratos
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.0 M4
>            Reporter: Imesh Gunaratne
>            Assignee: Imesh Gunaratne
>             Fix For: 4.1.0 M5
>
>
> Currently in the messaging component there is no abstraction found between 
> the message broker transport and messaging implementation. All the 
> publisher/subscriber/listener classes are directly referring MQTT library 
> classes.
> IMO it would be better to have such abstraction because it will allow us to 
> switch to a different transport with less effort without having to update the 
> entire messaging component.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to