I run a couple of test scenarios and created the jiras below for the issues encountered. Please note, that for the 974 I am not exactly sure if this is really is an issue, or a onetime occurrence but it might be worthwhile to take a look at the logs.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-974 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-974 From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 12:13 PM To: dev@stratos.apache.org Subject: RE: [Grouping] Issue with dependencies in nested grouping scenario (termination) Hi Reka, It’s working. I’ll cont. testing other grouping scenarios Thanks Martin From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 9:16 AM To: dev@stratos.apache.org<mailto:dev@stratos.apache.org> Subject: RE: [Grouping] Issue with dependencies in nested grouping scenario (termination) Ok, Let you know how it goes, Thanks Martin From: Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 4:38 AM To: dev Subject: Re: [Grouping] Issue with dependencies in nested grouping scenario (termination) Hi Martin, I have fixed the issues found with current implementation and pushed the changes. Can you take the pull and try out the same again? This the result that i got from your definition. 1. Terminating "c1xxx" (deleting the VM through open stack UI) : member becomes obsolete, VM is restarted – expected 2. terminating "c1alias51": Terminating VM "c1alias51" is restarted – as expected 3. terminating "c1alias61": 1. Terminating cluster "c1alias61" and Termination cluster "c1alias51" in parallel, 2. Restarted cluster "c1alias61", 3. Restarted cluster "c1alias51" 4. terminating "c1alias71": 1. Terminating cluster "c1alias71", Termination cluster "c1alias61" and Terminating cluster "c1alias51" in parallel, 2. Restart cluster "c1alias71", 3. Restart cluster "c1alias61", 4. Restart cluster "c1alias51" If there is a start up dependent, then we will have to kill all the dependent instances and bring them all again using start order. Please note that we have achieved it by terminating the dependent clusters and recreate them again using the startOrder. I'm also in the process of testing for terminate-all case. Will update you on that as well. Thanks, Reka On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <r...@wso2.com<mailto:r...@wso2.com>> wrote: Hi Martin, I could get only the simple two dependent clusters working..When i tried with your sample, i got few issues..I'm in the middle of testing the fix to make it working.. I will do more testing on this and update you.. Thanks, Reka On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu <r...@wso2.com<mailto:r...@wso2.com>> wrote: Hi Martin, I will try with your samples and update on how is it going.. Thanks, Reka On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) <mep...@cisco.com<mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Reka, Isuru, I was testing a scenario with nested groups: “standalone” cartridge “cisco_sample_vm” (alias "c1xxx") - not defined in a group, only in application group7: has a cartridge “cisco_sample_vm” (alias "c1alias71") , no dependencies group6: has a cartridge “cisco_sample_vm” ("c1alias61"), dependency on group7, "terminationBehaviour": "terminate-dependents" group5: has a cartridge “cisco_sample_vm” ("c1alias51"), dependency on group6, "terminationBehaviour": "terminate-dependents" startup works as expected : 1. "c1alias71", 2. "c1alias61", 3. "c1alias51” Termination shows the following: 1. Terminating "c1xxx" (deleting the VM through open stack UI) : member becomes obsolete, VM is restarted – expected 2. terminating "c1alias51": VM "c1alias51" is restarted – as expected 3. terminating "c1alias61": no change – expected result: 1. Termination of "c1alias51", 2. Restart of "c1alias61", 4. terminating "c1alias71": no change – expected result: 1. Termination of "c1alias61", 2. Termination of "c1alias51", 3. Restart of "c1alias71", 4. Restart of "c1alias61", 5. Restart of "c1alias51" I attached the group definitions, application definitions (I can provide logs with debug enabled per request, didn’t want to send them to everyone on the mailer) Let me know I am wrong in my assumptions or the jsons are incorrect, Thanks Martin -- Reka Thirunavukkarasu Senior Software Engineer, WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com, Mobile: +94776442007<tel:%2B94776442007> -- Reka Thirunavukkarasu Senior Software Engineer, WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com, Mobile: +94776442007<tel:%2B94776442007> -- Reka Thirunavukkarasu Senior Software Engineer, WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com, Mobile: +94776442007
