Hi,

Otherwise others will have different states.



Touched, not typed. Erroneous words are a feature, not a typo.
On Nov 22, 2014 10:33 AM, "Chamila De Alwis" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sorry, accidentally clipped this part from the previous email.
>
> What my concern is that whenever we change the state of a member in the
> cloud controller, should we send a corresponding event to let the
> components update their model?
>
>
> Regards,
> Chamila de Alwis
> Software Engineer | WSO2 | +94772207163
> Blog: code.chamiladealwis.com
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Chamila De Alwis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Udara,
>>
>> Yes, that is how it is done. When the first CompleteTopologyEvent is
>> received, the topology is updated and a flag is set to stop further
>> processing of the event.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chamila de Alwis
>> Software Engineer | WSO2 | +94772207163
>> Blog: code.chamiladealwis.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Udara Liyanage <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Chamila,
>>>
>>> Component first wait for complete topology to build its in memory model.
>>> Later individual events update the in memory model. That's the current
>>> model. I am not sure whether components update its in memory upon each
>>> Complete topology event receiving, I guess it need not to.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Touched, not typed. Erroneous words are a feature, not a typo.
>>> On Nov 22, 2014 3:16 AM, "Chamila De Alwis" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Is the $subject reasonable at a point when there is no event to
>>>> represent a specific change done to a particular member?
>>>>
>>>> The scenario is a component whose topology information is outdated
>>>> because when a particular state change is done a corresponding event is not
>>>> being fired.
>>>>
>>>> Or is the idea to use Member{Status}Event to broadcast a member status
>>>> change among the listeners?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Chamila de Alwis
>>>> Software Engineer | WSO2 | +94772207163
>>>> Blog: code.chamiladealwis.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to