+1 for meaningful names. If we go with "[cartridge1]-[cartridge2]-group" naming, then we could get some conflicts between some groups. For instance, group6c6 and group8 both got tomcat1 and tomcat2 cartridges.
Then again, how do we name a group which consists groups in it? Thank you, Vishanth On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Udara Liyanage <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have tried several samples and lot of them are broken due to artefact >> issues. We need to keep them stable. >> >> It seems it is better to keep meaningful names for groups such as >> "esb-php-group" rather than names like "groupc6" etc. >> > +for meaningful names. Have experienced the communicability of these names > >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> -- >> Lahiru Sandaruwan >> Committer and PMC member, Apache Stratos, >> Senior Software Engineer, >> WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com >> lean.enterprise.middleware >> >> email: [email protected] blog: http://lahiruwrites.blogspot.com/ >> linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/lahiru-sandaruwan/16/153/146 >> >> > > > -- > > Udara Liyanage > Software Engineer > WSO2, Inc.: http://wso2.com > lean. enterprise. middleware > > web: http://udaraliyanage.wordpress.com > phone: +94 71 443 6897 > -- *Vishanth Balasubramaniam* Software Engineer WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com lean.enterprise.middleware mobile: *+94771737718* about me: *http://about.me/vishanth <http://about.me/vishanth>*
