+1. Since we are planing to implement this for 4.1.1 minor release, shall we do this implementation in a new branch?
Thanks, Gayan On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Imesh Gunaratne <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 Thanks for contributing to this Dinithi! > > Few months back Lasindu did a major feature implementation for this and > due to merge conflicts found with Composite Application Model and > Kubernetes feature implementation we had to drop the entire branch. > > In this effort may be we could do an initial implementation to isolate the > artifacts on the API level and on a second stage we could implement another > feature to isolate events sent to message broker and isolate data stored in > the registry/database. > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Dinithi De Silva <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> In the current Stratos implementation, the artifacts which are created by >> a particular tenant is visible to all other tenants. I am going to >> implement the tenant isolation mechanism, so that the artifacts will be >> only visible to the tenant which has created the artifacts. >> >> In order to implement this, the uuid attribute will be introduced as the >> global identifier and the tenantId attribute will remain as the tenant >> identifier. >> >> As a further modification, we can include the "isPublic" property to make >> an artifact visible to all other tenants. >> >> Note: >> We can include this implementation in Stratos 4.1.1 minor release. >> >> Thanks. >> -- >> *Dinithi De Silva* >> Associate Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. >> m:+94716667655 | e:[email protected] | w: www.wso2.com >> | a: #20, Palm Grove, Colombo 03 >> > > > > -- > Imesh Gunaratne > > Senior Technical Lead, WSO2 > Committer & PMC Member, Apache Stratos > -- Gayan Gunarathne Technical Lead, WSO2 Inc. (http://wso2.com) Committer & PMC Member, Apache Stratos email : [email protected] | mobile : +94 766819985
