I appreciate including rationale for the decisions – it advances the conversation beyond personal preference to what will be in the best interest of the project.
I also appreciate a minimal design, where the ability to reproduce and recognize the logo in a wide variety of contexts (small sizes, t-shirts, inverted coloring) contributes to the development of the brand. Many of the logos I admire have been distilled to their essence, are accessible to the color-blind, etc. For me #1 is at least as strong as the more embellished versions (3 colors, gradients, font manipulation), while better serving the many contexts this logo may be called upon to serve. -Jonathan *From:* Noah Slater [mailto:[email protected]] *Sent:* Tuesday, July 02, 2013 6:34 AM *To:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: Apache Stratos Logo I order of preference: 1, 3, 7 (This also happens to be order of design simplicity.) On 2 July 2013 07:00, Amal Rangana <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, By considering the comments, I am sending the attached logos with the TM. Amal On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Chip Childers <[email protected]> wrote: On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:45:05PM +0530, Amal Rangana wrote: > Hi All, > > I have done some logo designs for the Apache Stratos project. Attached the > designs with this for comments. > > Thanks, > Amal Rangana When you do get to finished logo designs, please don't forget to include a (TM) in the image. -- NS
