Even 2.0 will be confusing right? Should it be 1.1?
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Paul Fremantle <[email protected]> wrote: > I concur. I think calling this 1.0.0 would be confusing. Paul > > > On 4 July 2013 19:35, Lakmal Warusawithana <[email protected]> wrote: > >> HI, >> >> We are progressing on re-factoring Stratos code based to Apache. As I >> discuss previously, first milestone release is same as (no any feature or >> fixes) WSO2 Stratos 2.0 release but releasing with re-factoring to Apache. >> All donation codes are changed to org.apache and licence are fixed to >> Apache. Then we need to take a decision what release version are we going. >> I can see two option; >> >> 1. Apache Stratos 2.0.0-incubating >> 2. Apache Stratos 1.0.0-incubating >> >> I personally like to go with #1, because here we are releasing same but >> in Apache. Also previous WSO2 Stratos was opensource and those community >> can easily adapt to Apache Stratos with out confusion. WDYT? >> >> thanks >> -- >> Lakmal Warusawithana >> Software Architect; WSO2 Inc. >> Mobile : +94714289692 >> Blog : http://lakmalsview.blogspot.com/ >> >> > > > -- > Paul Fremantle > CTO and Co-Founder, WSO2 > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair, VP, Apache Synapse > > UK: +44 207 096 0336 > US: +1 646 595 7614 > > blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org > twitter.com/pzfreo > [email protected] > > wso2.com Lean Enterprise Middleware > > Disclaimer: This communication may contain privileged or other > confidential information and is intended exclusively for the addressee/s. > If you are not the intended recipient/s, or believe that you may have > received this communication in error, please reply to the sender indicating > that fact and delete the copy you received and in addition, you should not > print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information > contained in this communication. Internet communications cannot be > guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not > accept liability for any errors or omissions. >
