Hi, On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Lakmal Warusawithana <[email protected]>wrote:
> AFAIK those changes already fixed in newest version of jcloud. Anyway we > need to go to jcloud apache version after our build stable. > +1. We shouldn't maintain any source, which doesn't belong to apache stratos. If we have an OSGi requirement,(if we need bundles) we better ask it from the jclouds community as well... > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Jul 11, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > What we have is complete source which is customized. >>> >>> Orthogonal to this discussion, can you guys engage with jclouds >>> community and contribute back to JClouds next release? >>> >> +1... >> >>> >>> Suresh >>> >>> > >>> > Thanks. >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Chip Childers < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 04:11:29PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: >>> > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 01:34:23AM +0530, Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote: >>> > > > Hi, >>> > > > >>> > > > Shall we bring dependency directory to the code base. We need a >>> place to >>> > > > have followings, >>> > > > >>> > > > org.jclouds.api:openstack-nova:jar:1.5.0-beta.5.wso2v1, >>> > > > org.jclouds.api:openstack-keystone:jar:1.5.0-beta.5.wso2v1, >>> > > > org.jclouds.api:openstack-nova:jar:1.5.0-beta.5.wso2v1 >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > Are you suggesting adding the jar files into the git repo? >>> > > >>> > > If so, I don't recommend it. Apache releases are "source only", so >>> if >>> > > those are in the repo it will require removing them from the source >>> > > tarball. Is there any reason that you can't depend on them in the >>> > > project POMs? >>> > > >>> > > Keep in mind the jclouds is another podling within the incubator, so >>> if >>> > > you need anything from them I'd bet they could help. >>> > > >>> > > -chip >>> > >>> > And just to provide a link to explain what I meant by "source only", >>> see >>> > the following paragraph that's at [1]. >>> > >>> > """ >>> > The Apache Software Foundation produces open source software. All >>> > releases are in the form of the source materials needed to make changes >>> > to the software being released. In some cases, binary/bytecode packages >>> > are also produced as a convenience to users that might not have the >>> > appropriate tools to build a compiled version of the source. In all >>> such >>> > cases, the binary/bytecode package must have the same version number as >>> > the source release and may only add binary/bytecode files that are the >>> > result of compiling that version of the source code release. >>> > """ >>> > >>> > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > -- >>> > Lahiru Sandaruwan >>> > Software Engineer, >>> > Platform Technologies, >>> > WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com >>> > lean.enterprise.middleware >>> > >>> > email: [email protected] cell: (+94) 773 325 954 >>> > blog: http://lahiruwrites.blogspot.com/ >>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/lahirus >>> > linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/lahiru-sandaruwan/16/153/146 >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> Lahiru Sandaruwan >> Software Engineer, >> Platform Technologies, >> WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com >> lean.enterprise.middleware >> >> email: [email protected] cell: (+94) 773 325 954 >> blog: http://lahiruwrites.blogspot.com/ >> twitter: http://twitter.com/lahirus >> linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/lahiru-sandaruwan/16/153/146 >> >> > > > -- > Lakmal Warusawithana > Software Architect; WSO2 Inc. > Mobile : +94714289692 > Blog : http://lakmalsview.blogspot.com/ > > -- Pradeep Fernando. http://pradeepfernando.blogspot.com/
