[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Imesh Gunaratne updated STRATOS-159:
------------------------------------

    Description: 
According to the new Stratos architecture the load balancer is loosely coupled 
with it's core components. The only dependency it has so far with Stratos Core 
is with the Message Broker. As a result it is easier for a third party load 
balancer to plug into Stratos without much effort.

To support this functionality we need to implement an extension API which could 
be used to implement an extension for a given load balancer to plug-in to 
Stratos.

  was:
According to the new Stratos architecture the load balancer is loosely coupled 
with it's core components. The only dependency it has so far with Stratos Core 
is with the Message Broker. As a result it is easier for a third party load 
balancer to plug into Stratos without much effort.

To support this functionality we need to implement a common load balancer 
component which could be used to implement an extension for a given load 
balancer to plug-in to Stratos.


> Implement Load Balancer Extension API
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STRATOS-159
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-159
>             Project: Stratos
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Imesh Gunaratne
>            Assignee: Imesh Gunaratne
>             Fix For: 4.0.0 Alpha 1
>
>
> According to the new Stratos architecture the load balancer is loosely 
> coupled with it's core components. The only dependency it has so far with 
> Stratos Core is with the Message Broker. As a result it is easier for a third 
> party load balancer to plug into Stratos without much effort.
> To support this functionality we need to implement an extension API which 
> could be used to implement an extension for a given load balancer to plug-in 
> to Stratos.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to