Unless there are divergent views on this, I do not think a formal vote is required. But I will wait for atleast a day more to see if any one has any other opinions.
Meanwhile, it will be great if we have volunteers to update the project team page with the current PPMC. Note, a valid PPMC member should have a valid apache account and should have been notified to the IPMC and announced to the community. Suresh On Apr 2, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Nirmal Fernando <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I reviewed the podling status page. Other then a website copyright type > (which I fixed), I did find everything else to be correct and up-to-date. The > last missing piece I see is the list of Initial PMC members. Shall we goahead > with the current PPMC [1]?. My recommendation will be to request all (or a > subset) of mentors to stay on for atleast some time. Stratos has enough > Members, so that may not be needed, but since the diversity of this project > has been debated, my suggestion is to retain all non-WSO2 members on the PMC > to ensure the project continues to function in a neutral way. > > Thoughts? > > I too agree with going ahead with the current PPMC. > > NOTE: This email is to dev list, so please refrain from taking any particular > names. If merits of individuals have to be discussed, please move this thread > to private and discuss there. > > Suresh > [1] - http://stratos.incubator.apache.org/community/people.html > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Nirmal > > Nirmal Fernando. > PPMC Member & Committer of Apache Stratos, > Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. > > Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/
