On Tue Jan 13 2015 at 8:27:29 PM Steve Blackmon <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've cancelled the 0.1-rc1 vote, and I'm working to get a rc2 ready that > can pass. > > The issue Ate raised about the DISCLAIMER is valid, but what I'm seeing is > very strange. > > The jar artifacts generated in the target directories of the modules during > the release:prepare step all have DISCLAIMER files. The sources, javadoc, > and test-jar archives often do, but not always. > > Every jar artifact generated underneath target/checkout during the > release:perform step are missing DISCLAIMER files. > > The configuration of maven-source-plugin, maven-javadoc-plugin, > and maven-jar-plugin derive solely from the project root pom, and I'm using > the apache-release profile during both release commands. So I'm confused > as to why some modules get packaged with a DISCLAIMER and some don't during > prepare, and why no modules get packaged with a DISCLAIMER during perform. > > If anyone has any ideas, I'd love to hear them. I'll keep messing with > poms and crossing my fingers. > I thought maven assembly needed to add the disclaimer to non-source jars... > > Thanks, > Steve > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Matt Franklin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Good points Ate. I apologize to the community for the incorrect +1 from > my > > vote. I missed the binary artifacts issues in the original vote, but > they > > are important things to get right. > > > > Everyone should keep in mind that this is a learning process and as these > > items get resolved, it will make the next releases easier. > > On Fri Jan 09 2015 at 3:56:30 AM Ate Douma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > FYI. > > > > > > Sorry about the late and negative vote, see below. > > > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.1-incubating > > > Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:52:28 +0100 > > > From: Ate Douma <[email protected]> > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > -1 (binding) > > > > > > Besides the findings already reported by Justin Mclean in addition I > > > noticed: > > > - binary artifacts, including the -sources and -javadoc jars, do not > > > contain the > > > required DISCLAIMER file alongside the NOTICE and LICENSE files > > > > > > I also encountered build test failures. > > > > > > For the next release candidate I strongly suggest to provide at least a > > > basic > > > "getting started" either online or with the source because for > outsiders > > > it is > > > totally unclear how to use Streams or even what it does ... > > > > > > Regards, Ate > > > > > > For the IPMC: I'm a mentor on Streams but was on holiday when this vote > > > ran on > > > the streams-dev list. > > > > > > > > > On 2014-12-21 23:06, Steve Blackmon wrote: > > > > This is the first incubator release for Apache Streams, with the > > > artifacts > > > > being versioned as 0.1-incubating. > > > > > > > > We are requesting at least two additional IPMC member votes, as we > have > > > > received 1 binding IPMC +1 vote during the release voting on > > streams-dev. > > > > > > > > VOTE: > > > > http://markmail.org/thread/kbgr73ndhztwybsh > > > > RESULT: > > > > http://markmail.org/thread/fz53tiiqnadwyagg > > > > > > > > IPMC member votes from the streams-dev list: > > > > Matthew Franklin: +1 > > > > > > > > Git tag streams-project-0.1-incubating-rc1 (commit 8e561d6) > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-streams. > > > git;a=commit;h=8e561d60bae3fb74baad05ed5a0d1be6631ceab1 > > > > > > > > Maven staging repo: > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreams-1000 > > > > > > > > Source release: > > > > http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > orgapachestreams-1000/org/apache/streams/streams- > project/0.1-incubating/ > > > streams-project-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip > > > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sblackmon.asc > > > > > > > > Vote open for 72 hours. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > > > > > Steve Blackmon > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
