James, There is a lot of great new stuff in master, certainly enough to warrant a release.
I’m currently working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STREAMS-508 Very excited about the potential of the third-party rest proxy feature to simplify the code involved in writing new streams providers. My approach to STREAMS-508 is: annotate each interface, remove the bulk of the logic in Twitter.java and Instagram.java, and run the existing integration tests to confirm each Provider still works. I’ve found two cases where it looks like we need a new feature on the Juneau side to use the rest proxy feature as we’ve planned. Here’s relevant parts of Statuses.java, the biggest of the interfaces: ---- @Remoteable(path = "https://api.twitter.com/1.1/statuses";) public interface Statuses { @RemoteMethod(httpMethod = "GET", path = "/home_timeline.json") public List<Tweet> homeTimeline( @QueryIfNE("*") StatusesHomeTimelineRequest parameters ); @RemoteMethod(httpMethod = "GET", path = "/lookup.json") public List<Tweet> lookup( @QueryIfNE("*") StatusesLookupRequest parameters); @RemoteMethod(httpMethod = "GET", path = "/mentions_timeline.json") public List<Tweet> mentionTimeline( @QueryIfNE("*") StatusesMentionsTimelineRequest parameters); @RemoteMethod(httpMethod = "GET", path = "/show/{id}") public Tweet show( @Path(value = "id") String id, @QueryIfNE("*") StatusesShowRequestParameters parameters); @RemoteMethod(httpMethod = "GET", path = "/user_timeline.json") public List<Tweet> userTimeline( @QueryIfNE("*") StatusesUserTimelineRequest parameters); } — The two gaps are: 1) An implementation of @QueryIfNE("*”) that allow a bean to stand-in for multiple GET parameters 2) The ability to use @Path parameters in @RemoteMethod Do you think these additions could be squeezed in before the 6.2.0 release? As is, ~50% of the twitter and instagram methods can use rest proxy, #1 unlocks an additional 40% and #2 the final 10% Thanks! Steve On May 16, 2017 at 8:24:02 AM, James Bognar ([email protected]) wrote: Hi everyone, I'm thinking we have enough changes for a minor release: http://juneau.incubator.apache.org/site/apidocs/overview-summary.html#6.2.1 Are there any objections to me cutting a new release? Steve Blackmon...your input would be helpful. Are there any requirements still needed by Streams? Standard 72-hour objection window applies. Thanks! James
