> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2004 03:41 PM
> To: 'Struts Developers List'
> Subject: Re: URL validation 
> 
> On 03/15/2004 10:16 AM Adam Hardy wrote:
> > On 03/13/2004 07:46 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 
> >>> From: Adam Hardy I provide URL validation on a page which saves links 
> >>> for
> >>> users.
> >>>
> >>> I put together the latest build of commons-validator (1.1.2) and struts
> >>> (1.2) to see what the URL validation is like.
> >>>
> >>> The class for server-side validation is in place, but the javascript
> >>> doesn't exist.
> >>>
> >>> It works very strictly, too strictly for me.
> >>>
> >>> Most users will want to save links such as
> >>>
> >>> http://www.google.com
> >>> http://jakarta.apache.org/
> >>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-user&m=105511005106573&w=2
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> This is definately a bug and they should have passed,
> >> I haven't run the unit tests against it in some time do they still
> >> pass ?
> >> My guess is that it might not be expecting the '/' after the domain 
> >> name. This would probably only require a small tweak
> >> to the regular expression thats used.
> >>
> >> I would apply any patches that were submitted 
> 
> Just got around to looking at a glitch in UrlValidator and I've found 
> that the isValidPath() method explicitly fails when the path (after the 
> port number) is '/' - e.g.
> 
>   http://www.google.com:80/?action=view expected:<true> but was:<false>
> 
> The code actually does the following:
> 
> if (path.endsWith("/")) {
>      return false;
> }
> 
> Surely this should not be so?

The way I read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2396.html
section 3.3

I don't believe the path segment can legally end with a '/'.
Read the RFC and see what you think.

So I don't believe http://www.google.com:80/?action=xyz
strictly speaking is valid, should we optionally allow for it
probably.

http://www.google.com:80?action         would be valid
http://www.google.com:80/path?action    would be valid

> 
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to