Actually, I don't think any Struts release has included a validator 1.1.x build. So we haven't given people a chance to remove references to deprecated functionality that has been removed in the 1.2.x series.
You could either apply the patches to the branch or just release 1.1.3 from the branch without patches. David --- David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since you patched HEAD, maybe we should forget about the branch and > 1.1.3 > and just release 1.2.0. If 1.2.0 is a dud we can quickly patch it and > release 1.2.1. Quick releases are one benefit of the (IMO confusing) > httpd style versioning. > > I would rather see us moving forward than rolling back patches and > creating more confusion. > > David > > --- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just found out I've been patching and testing the wrong branch of > the > > Commons Validator component :( > > > > Between this snafu and the issues with Struts Faces, perhaps the best > > thing would be to roll back the changes that create a dependence on > > Commons Validator 1.1.3. > > > > Do we know if there are any dire issues with Commons Validator 1.1.2 > > that would scuttle a vote to make that a stable release? > > > > -Ted. > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. > http://messenger.yahoo.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
