DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29792>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29792 Action method saveErrors lose messages on chained actions ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-25 13:56 ------- This was discussed in passing on the users list this week also. We talked about adding "addErrors" and "addMessages" which you could use in contexts where there might be existing messages which you didn't want to replace. If that's the common behavior, then it's probably as good or better than adding a "get" method and expecting people to get and resave. Even though it's true that chaining actions is problematic, I don't see any reason to insist that actions have no right to retrieve messages/errors. Therefore, I wouldn't object to getErrors(request) and getMessages(request) which do what you suggest -- but i prefer the simpler names. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
