I looked and maven is pulling servlet 2.2.  I would assume that faces
is using that same servlet.jar.  I just rebuilt faces against 2.3 and
the problems seem to have gone away.  I haven't tried 2.4, but it
seems that it should work fine there.  It is my guess after trying to
build struts-faces in eclipse using servlet 2.2 that the problem is
with 2.2 not being supported.  (And it shouldn't be right?)
Michael

On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 18:56:41 -0700, Craig McClanahan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ted Husted wrote:
> 
> >I imagine Craig has Struts-Faces compiling against 2.4 to make sure it stays in 
> >synch with Tomcat 5.
> >
> >
> >
> It is indeed, but that's actually a mistake.  It needs to compile
> against the 2.3 version, since that's what JSF specifies as a minimum
> platform.  I'll fix that in tonight's run.
> 
> >But, the question is whether we want to mandate that Struts-Faces can only compile 
> >against 2.3 (and not 2.4)? Or vice-versa. Or is there a way to write the class so 
> >it compiles under either?
> >
> >
> >
> I'll take a look at the changes once I catch up a little bit more, and
> might be able to come up with something clever that makes this possible
> (still recovering from JavaOne and ~11k backlogged mail messages :-).
> 
> >I know this is a pain. We went through the same problem with DataSources between 
> >2.2 and 2.3. I'm not sure what the issue here is, but for DataSources, the 
> >interface changed and we had to stub the new members so that they threw exceptions 
> >if called. Of course, the problem with that approach is it may obviate new 
> >functionality or rely on deprecated methods.
> >
> >-Ted.
> >
> >
> 
> Craig
> 
> 
> 
> >On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 14:14:02 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >
> >
> >>James,
> >>
> >>i also guess it is the result of the commitment.
> >>i submitted (first) a wrapper, that builds against 2.4 reason is,
> >>the build-porperties had *default* to 2.4
> >>
> >>okay ted asks for a 2.3-wrapper, so i created that candidate.
> >>
> >>i think the wrapper should compile against 2.3
> >>since jsf is able to run in j2ee1.3-containers
> >>
> >>So i am wondering, why struts-faces uses 2.4
> >>for compiling.
> >>
> >>btw. the 2.3 wrapper runs on servlet2.4-containers (like tomcat5.0)
> >>
> >>Matthias
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>I think it is happening because of the changes I committed for
> >>>your fix for MyFaces.  If you look at when the builds stopped,
> >>>it's right after I made the commits on 6/29.  It must be an issue
> >>>of what version of servlet.jar that the HttpServletRequestWrapper
> >>>class is being compiled against. Is it not possible to make that
> >>>class compilable against both 2.3 and 2.4?
> >>>
> >>>-James
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>wessendorf.de] Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 6:29 AM To:
> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Struts-faces
> >>>
> >>>see http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-
> >>>faces/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>the nightly build is empty again,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>so is there a logfile, where i can check, why it is not build
> >>>successful?
> >>>
> >>>Cheers,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Matthias Weßendorf
> >>>Aechterhoek 18
> >>>DE-48282 Emsdetten
> >>>Germany
> >>>Email: matthias AT wessendorf DOT net
> >>>URL: http://www.wessendorf.net
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>--- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> >>>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>--- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> >>>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> >>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to