-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Wessendorf Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 9:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Myfaces-develop] Fwd: MyFaces - Struts
Oliver i used the examples, that were shipped via struts-faces. there is a *link* to URL http://localhost:8080/struts-faces/editRegistration.do?action=Create okay, struts does it's way (the FacesRequestProcessor of integration-lib) Action.clazz gets processed. it returns an ActionForward-Objekt. (called "success"), but in struts-config the Actionforward points to a path "/registration.faces". ok fine. in FacesRequestProcessor, that is used instead of *default* RequestProcessor, the method "doForward()" checks, if URI (/registration.faces) is an Struts-Request. it is not that case. so it creates a FacesContext <code> // Create a FacesContext for this request if necessary LifecycleFactory lf = (LifecycleFactory) FactoryFinder.getFactory(FactoryFinder.LIFECYCLE_FACTORY); Lifecycle lifecycle = // FIXME - alternative lifecycle ids lf.getLifecycle(LifecycleFactory.DEFAULT_LIFECYCLE); FacesContext context = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance(); if (context == null) { if (log.isTraceEnabled()) { log.trace(" Creating new FacesContext for '" + uri + "'"); } FacesContextFactory fcf = (FacesContextFactory) FactoryFinder.getFactory(FactoryFinder.FACES_CONTEXT_FACTORY); context = fcf.getFacesContext(servlet.getServletContext(), request, response, lifecycle); } </code> after that it creates a new ViewRoot, delegates the context to our JSPViewHandler, finally it calls responseComplete() <code> // Create a new view root ViewHandler vh = context.getApplication().getViewHandler(); if (log.isTraceEnabled()) { log.trace(" Creating new view for '" + uri + "'"); } context.setViewRoot(vh.createView(context, uri)); // Cause the view to be rendered if (log.isTraceEnabled()) { log.trace(" Rendering view for '" + uri + "'"); } lifecycle.render(context); context.responseComplete(); </code> so the Servlet-Path is still the *.do - thing, that code works *directly* with RI, > This will be the correct one in > your case > but might be wrong in some other case. jupp :-) that was the reason of my question. do you need any more information on that? Cheers, ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ Myfaces-develop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/myfaces-develop --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
