Done as to 1.2.1: http://cvs.apache.org/dist/struts/v1.2.1
If we announce 1.2.1 (or 1.2.2 with ##27332) to the USER list as a Beta, does it have to be signed and such? I only ask since I still need to get setup for signing these things. -Ted. On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 20:54:02 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: > In catching up on back email, I noticed a piece of advice about > where to put interim builds that should be made available to the > public for review, but are not official signed releases (which > would go to http://www.apache.org/dist). The suggestion from > infrastructure was to use: > > http://cvs.apache.org/dist/ > > which has the dual advantages (over someone's arbitrary home > directory) of implying that "this is likely to become a release > unless there are fatal problems with it", and it doesn't go out to > the mirror networks. I suggest we use this approach for release > candidates (and alpha/beta voted releases) until they are voted GA. > > Craig > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
