I don't see a difference, Martin.
It's moot to me. I haven't had time to test it, so I hadn't intended to voice any input. I don't see what you're quoting to say that only PMC members have voting rights on the quality of a release though. In fact, I still feel my original view is valid: PMC members are there to authorize the release, once committers determine it's quality by a vote.
I'm not trying to be thick :-) I just don't see what you're "pointing" to as an authority on the matter. It's more for the sake of my understanding, I suppose. I might care in the future ;-)
Y'all have fun. I've got to make a road trip this weekend :-( No rest for the wicked!
Night,
Eddie
----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Eddie Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality
You're quoting from the Jakarta decision making page. We're not at Jakarta any more, and have our own process now. You have some catching up to do, Eddie. ;-)
Here's what we're doing these days:
http://struts.apache.org/releases.html
-- Martin Cooper
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 20:55:47 -0600, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I was of the impression that committers and up judged quality and PMC
members were in charge of deciding whether distribution would happen or not.
<quot>
After a new release is built, it must be tested before being released to the
public. Majority approval is required before the release can be made. Once a
release is approved by the Committers, the Project Management Committee can
authorize its distribution on behalf of the Foundation.
</quot>
Am I misinterpreting that?
Eddie
----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 12:49 AM Subject: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality
> The Struts 1.2.6 test build has been available for about two weeks > now. Once you have had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of > this build, please respond to the following vote. > > ----- > Based on its quality, the Struts 1.2.6 build should be classified as: > > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > ----- > > If you are voting for Alpha or Beta, please state your concerns with > the build as it is today. > > Only the votes of Struts PMC members are binding. However, all > opinions and feedback are welcome. > > -- > Martin Cooper > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
--- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0449-1, 12/02/2004 Tested on: 12/3/2004 8:55:48 PM avast! - copyright (c) 2000-2004 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0449-1, 12/02/2004 Tested on: 12/3/2004 9:57:04 PM avast! - copyright (c) 2000-2004 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
