Hi, Martin, I don't think I said a thing about struts-chain. Why would you think I thought something I never mentioned and ignore what I did say?
What you suggest I said is patently stupid. So, I have to admit I don't think that. No one would think that. That would be perfect straw man, if that is what one wants. I just asked why JSF (not STRUTS-chain) is not OT. Why isn't it? If there is an obvious reason, we could state focused on what was said instead of something patently absurd. Struts-Faces is a sort of switch and a sort of oxymoron beyond that: a way to transition slowly away from Struts. That is okay, if Struts wants to officiate at its own funeral. But straight up JSF talk is clearly OT in my mind. I was, however, asking others what they think on THAT topic, not on struts-chain. Jack On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:50:38 -0800 (PST), Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Dakota Jack wrote: > > > How is JSF not OT with struts-dev or struts-user? Struts is not dead > > yet, is it? And, if not, why is struts airtime free to JSF? > > You don't consider a question about STRUTS-chain - a component in the > Struts sandbox - to be relevant to Struts? > > -- > Martin Cooper > > > > Jack > > > > > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:24:25 -0500, Deadman, Hal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> By the way, for the benefit of our developer community, i just read an > >>> article " Creating a Pet Store Application with JavaServer Faces, > >>> Spring, and Hibernate" > >>> http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=46977&DE=1 that demonstrates the > >>> readiness of involved technologies. I like to add 2 things to what the > >>> article has revealed: > >>> > >>> 1) Jsf and tiles are fuly integrated under myfaces. You do not need 2 > >>> jsp pages for every view (a wrapper page and a real fragment). Just 1 > >>> fragment jsp that makes a new page and 1 tiles definition. For those > >> who > >>> used Struts-1.x + Tiles to create a portal page (e.g. our current > >> portal > >>> and LifeRay), you may choose to forget about the portlet layout to > >> gain > >>> maximum flexibility for the portlet view i.e. perfectly fit for a > >>> complete jsf dynamic fragment + total flexibility to scrap an html > >>> fragment over the Internet + mixing of [Jsf + Jsp + Jstl] in the > >> portlet > >>> fragment. (I had this issue and asked the Jsf forum. I took me 4 days > >> to > >>> have it worked out and answered myself for the question) > >> > >> Does struts-faces provide a way for the JSF reference implementation to > >> work with tiles and not require two jsps per view? > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." > > > > ~Dakota Jack~ > > > > "You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep." > > > > ~Native Proverb~ > > > > "Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows." > > > > ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ "You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep." ~Native Proverb~ "Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows." ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
