Author: jmitchell Date: Tue Jan 11 07:13:04 2005 New Revision: 124905 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=124905 Log: fix a couple typos Modified: struts/core/trunk/doc/roadmap.xml
Modified: struts/core/trunk/doc/roadmap.xml Url: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/core/trunk/doc/roadmap.xml?view=diff&rev=124905&p1=struts/core/trunk/doc/roadmap.xml&r1=124904&p2=struts/core/trunk/doc/roadmap.xml&r2=124905 ============================================================================== --- struts/core/trunk/doc/roadmap.xml (original) +++ struts/core/trunk/doc/roadmap.xml Tue Jan 11 07:13:04 2005 @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ <p><b>1.5 considerations</b></p> <p> - Based on our own work with the "experimental" members inroduced in 1.3.x, we + Based on our own work with the "experimental" members introduced in 1.3.x, we might consider some other changes. </p> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ and ActionCommand implementations are supported. People could then mix-and-match Actions with ActionCommands (or even chains of ActionCommands). We might even support placing an ActionCommand interface on ActionForm, so - people could skip having a sepate Action or ActionCommand class. The ActionForm + people could skip having a seperate Action or ActionCommand class. The ActionForm could do it all. </p> @@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ <li> Struts APIs assume servlet API objects (ServletContext, ServletRequest, ServletResponse), whereas JSR-168 - talks aboutPortletContext, PortletRequest, and PortletResponse. + talks about PortletContext, PortletRequest, and PortletResponse. We'd either need to change the calling sequence for Action.execute() -- problematic for backwards compatibility -- or fake it somehow in a portlet environment. </li> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
