On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:00:01 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote: > When you say 'docs' here, I'm not sure what you mean. With each > subproject building its own docs, perhaps you mean 'site'? That > would be the glue that holds the remainder together. Although I > recall Ted suggesting that 'core' own the main site and the > remaining subprojects would link to that. (The problem with that, > IMO, is that we still need some way of referring to the subprojects > from the main page, so I believe we still need a 'site'. We just > need to decide what's in that.)
Yes, a thin "site" subproject might be a better idea. The site subproject could introduce and link to the other subprojects, like a portal page. We could then just run core like any other subproject, with the same set of documents as the others. One trick would be to use a blank page at /index.html to that redirects to the /site/index.html page. The subprojects could then link back to /index.html or to ../site/index.html . -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
