What resources do we have available for this?
I would assume all we need is:
a) some disk space (looks like plenty)
b) nightly job to kick it off (or do we do this as part of Gump builds?)
c) rights to invoke ant
d) rights to invoke maven
e) rights to push the artifacts to a published location (which most committers have)
Did I miss anything?
-- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx
----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: Adjustments to Struts Nightly Builds
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:11:13 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:05:30 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We don't want 'core' building stuff in 'apps'. The 'core' subproject
> should not know about any other subprojects. As we discussed on
> another thread, any uber-build stuff we have should live in a 'build'
> pseudo-subproject, so that it's not part of any individual subproject.
>
> However, note that such an uber-build would serve only two purposes:
> (1) to make the nightly builds slightly simpler; (2) for the
> convenience of developers wanting to build everything. Since the
> subprojects will be independently released, we will not need an
> uber-build to handle the release process. For these reasons, I think
> the uber-build, if we have one, should be kept very simple.
We could also just have the nightly build script create a binary for each of the top level subprojects, and skip having an uber-build at all. Then, we'd just need a build at the top of each subproject's tree, and most of them have one already.
That would be fine with me.
I'd like to do just one source distro, though, that has all the subprojects in it. Stripping out the JAR files that were incorrectly included in last night's build will get the size back to reasonable. Does this sound agreeable?
Are you thinking that this would be just a part of the nightly build process, rather than something an uber-build would do (thus avoiding the uber-build again)? That would also be fine with me. At some point, though, I do want to get the nightly builds running on ASF hardware. (Yeah, I know, I've been saying that for ages and haven't done anything about it. But I will one day. Really. ;)
-- Martin Cooper
> > -- > Martin Cooper >
Craig
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
