--- Original Message --- From: "Ceki Gülcü" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:06:03 +0100 Subject: UGLI instead of JCL?
> Hi Ted, > > May I suggest that for Shale you consider switching to UGLI [1] > instead of JCL because the former causes none of the class loader > problems of the latter? > > After spending a week trying to understand and reproduce JCL's > problems [2] I can confidently state that it is broken beyond > repair. Anyway, just to let you know... > > Cheers, > > [1] http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/ugli.html > [2] http://www.qos.ch/logging/classloader.jsp --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
