Soo, is that a yes to removing data-source? :) Don
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:45:08 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As long as we release regularly, then I would favor having the website and > docs reflect the nightly build. > > During the 1.1 death-march, we broke with that tradition briefly, but only > because it was taking so long to get to the next stable build. > > Having the latest and greatest up on the web makes it much easier to have > conversations about where we are and where we are going. > > Keeping the stable build on the web, creates a maintenance burden, and having > done it, I wouldn't recommend it as the status quo. > > -Ted. > > On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:51:42 -0800, Don Brown wrote: > > Are we going to finally remove data-source support for 1.3? If so, > > I don't mind going through the code and docs to clean it out. > > > > Related question: if we were to remove data-source support, should > > we remove it from the docs immediately? Do the docs reflect the > > current state of the code or the latest release? If the former, > > perhaps our docs shouldn't be so tied to the website to allow for > > the docs on the site to reflect the latest stable release while let > > developers modify the docs in the repository concurrently with > > feature additions/changes/removals. > > > > Don > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
