Thanks, Martin, but I think that your suggestion is not related to
what I am trying to do.

I have gotten rid of code in the last formulation to make this clear.  

Only the first three interfaces are really important and nothing has
changed in those ever.  What I am suggesting is using those interfaces
so that alternative applications can be used.

The particular application provided is just to show that it can be
done and is done.  So, the changes are irrelevant to what I am
suggesting.

I won't change it anymore.  

The first day this code was presented is as sufficient as today.  

I only made changes in hopes of getting some response.  It is ironic
that it has had the opposite affect.

You probably are the only one relevant to this anyway, and I assumed
that you would get this straight-off, as I am sure you have?

Jack


On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:15:51 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure how many of the committers relish the idea of reading
> through about 1,000 lines of completely uncommented code and trying to
> understand what it all means. And that on a wiki page, rather than in
> their favourite editor where they would have syntax colouring and
> could jump around at will, from definition to usage, etc., to help
> understand it. Add to that almost 40 updates to the wiki page in the
> last 10 days, and there's even less incentive to start looking at it,
> fully expecting a flurry of updates before they've got much beyond the
> first paragraph.
> 
> I would suggest that you finish your work on it first, then put the
> code somewhere that people can download and bring up in their editor,
> and have a wiki page that explains what you're trying to do and that
> points to the code download. That's much more likely to get people
> looking at it, at least in my opinion.
> 
> --
> Martin Cooper
> 
> 
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:29:19 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks, Frank.  I posted this code in response to Ted's suggestion
> > that this is the way to go to establish a dialogue with the committers
> > on code.
> >
> >
> > --
> > "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
> > ~Dakota Jack~
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 


-- 
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to