Trying to get to the Wiki now to add a comment... Seem to be having some network issues right now...
-- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com On Thu, March 17, 2005 2:06 pm, Dakota Jack said: > I really understand your pain, Frank. I don't understand why Ted > thinks this is not a central problem or why it is okay for one action > to process and another action to setup but not okay for one action to > do both. I do think that somehow combining setup and processing is > crucial. We all have to do it with hacks at the present, so far as I > can see. I welcome your contribution on the new wiki page in tandem > with the presentation you have already made. > > Jack > > > On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:23:49 -0500 (EST), Frank W. Zammetti > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, March 17, 2005 12:56 pm, Dakota Jack said: >> > This means that you EITHER have to use two actions, leading to all the >> > nonsense of chaining actions (why do you think that is recurrent, >> > Ted?), OR you have to make PAGE-A the same as PAGE-B, which you can >> > only do for so long unless you want to emulate Portlets, OR you have >> > to have the same ActionForm for BOTH PAGE-A AND PAGE-B. >> >> Or you can use setupItems! >> >> (Did anyone *not* see that coming?!?) >> >> And yes, before anyone says it, 1.3 solves this problem in a different >> way :) >> >> -- >> Frank W. Zammetti >> Founder and Chief Software Architect >> Omnytex Technologies >> http://www.omnytex.com >> > > > -- > "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." > ~Dakota Jack~ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
