Craig, I know this came up before in a converstion we had about dialogs. I know it doesn't solve the problem, but I am curious, what is the reason behind not exposing the navigation rules publicly? I figure you would have some answer being on the expert group for JSF and all.
Michael On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:18:41 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:48:40 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > David- > > > > > Oops, I forgot. I do have a tiles view handler. I used the MyFaces view > > > handler as a basis for mine, but I did things a little differently. > > > > ah, fine! Have you thought about a NavigationHandler? > > I found it usefull to use tiles definitions inside struts-config.xml > > for ActionForwards. > > > > I guess it should be possible to have a NavigationHandler that > > enables you to have something like: > > > > <navigation-case> > > <from-outcome>success</from-outcome> > > <to-view-id>myTilesDefinition</to-view-id> > > </navigation-case> > > > > That should definitely be possible ... but there's a tricky detail, in > that there's no public JSF API to read the configured navigation > rules. It seems likely that we'd need to define navigation rules with > a destination of a Tile in a separate file, and have the > NavigationHandler look there first, and delegate to the standard one > if there is no matching rule. > > Craig > > > -Matthias > > > > > david > > > > > >> > > >> -Matthias > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
