Actually, what I'm wondering about is the interpretation. Having a _ja file present, to me, says we have JA counterparts for these messages. If the actual entry is the same, isn't it better to have that come from the default bundle? This isn't a test resource, so I'm not sure appending something like (JA) is appropriate. I guess I'm going to leave it alone. If someone else adds the english entries, I'm not going to stop them. :) Or, if someone who understands the contents can help out, that'd be great, too. The most recent patches used to update the JA resource files were contributed by Yoshinori Ashizawa of jajakarta.org.
Hubert On Apr 5, 2005 8:29 PM, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, well, sort of. To truly ensure that the value returned "really" came > from the alternate bundle, I append the snippet described below. But then, > I'm tedious about that stuff.....it's your dime so it's your call ;) > > -- > James Mitchell > Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist > Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance > EdgeTech, Inc. > 678.910.8017 > AIM: jmitchtx > Yahoo: jmitchtx > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
