Yes, these entries would fit better under the Incubator wiki, along with a few other terms and phrase like "Thanks for Volunteering", "Them that does the work make the decisions", "Merit never expires", and "Don't be evil".
I'll get on it. -Ted. On 5/6/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You know, I've seen a couple of Wiki updates today and in recent days > past with regard to defining PITA, and some related things, and it has > frankly reached a point where someone has to speak up, and I guess it's > going to be me. > > We probably all know the people involved in these posts and know at > least some of the history behind it all, on both sides. > > Am I the only one that thinks this is a pretty immature way for people > who purport to be professionals to be dealing with one another? Forget > for a moment who may or may not have valid points, regardless of that, > is this the proper use for the Struts Wiki? It's essentially > name-calling in the guise of a FAQ entry and comes across, to me at > least, as petty and childish. > > Is this really the image anyone wants to project to the rest of the > world? Do we really want to see the Wiki devolve into a convenient > place for people to banter and bicker back and forth at each other in > cleverly disguised ways? > > I could certainly go remove the pages myself, but I'm not going to do > that. It isn't my place. I would hope that the authors would agree it > serves no useful purpose and potentially does more harm than good. > > Can I get an Amen?!? :) > > -- > Frank W. Zammetti > Founder and Chief Software Architect > Omnytex Technologies > http://www.omnytex.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
