I'm with Martin and Niall.

James

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 11:36 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Initial checkin of standalone Tiles 

I agree with all of Niall's points below. I'm especially concerned at the 
loss of history mentioned in #2, since history can be so important.

--
Martin Cooper


On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Niall Pemberton wrote:

> I have a few concerns/questions about the initial checkin of standalone
> Tiles into the sandbox, which David indicates in the SVN log is extracted
> from Struts 1.1:
>
> 1) I'm wondering why this is based on Struts 1.1, rather than the current
> version of tiles code? I did a quick scan (for starters) of the tiles
taglib
> and while there hasn't been a large amount of activity since Struts 1.1
> there have been some bug fixes and some other minor changes and it seems a
> shame to have to redo these changes rather than copying the current
> versions.
>
> 2) IMO it would be better to use SVN copy to create the initial code base
-
> seems a shame to loose all the subversion history by adding these as new
> artefacts. Since we have  Struts 1.1 versions tagged they could be copied
> either from the current versions or the Struts 1.1 versions.
>
> 3) The taglib package has been renamed to "org.apache.taglib.tiles" - I'm
> wondering if this will create a confusion with the Jakarta Taglibs project
> which uses "org.apache.taglibs.???" package name? Would this not be better
> and more consistent as "org.apache.tiles.taglib"?
>
> 4) Similar question about the message resources which are being duplicated
> from Struts - are we OK to use the "org.apache.util" package name for
these
> classes rather than "org.apache.tiles.util"? Also, its probably another
> discussion, but maybe these need to be replaced with something else
(commons
> resources?) rather than duplicating from struts.
>
> Niall
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to